Monday, October 15, 2018

52 Ancestors - #38 Yes- We Definitely Have Some Unusual Items!!

If you’ve been following my blog for a while, you have realized I have a lot of stuff. What may seem like useless ephemera to some is most certainly a genealogical treasure to me. You may recall my post on the ashes I found in my mother’s attic. That find allowed me to make a few connections on my uncle’s tree. Six years later, I still have the ashes, carefully encased in the knotted handkerchief. At some point, I will try to reunite Mania Nebenzahl with her descendants.

Despite attending several workshops and reading an entire book on downsizing written by Marian Burk Wood, I still can’t part with some of my “unusual” items. [1]

Prompted by the topic for Week #38 of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks blog challenge, let me share with you another item in our “genealogical treasure chest.”

My Grandfather’s Urology Reports From 1930 and 1931.

By the way, I did translate these. All I got from them was his counts on certain levels were "somewhat low."


Now, most people would have tossed these out immediately upon finding them among their family papers. I felt like I should do the same. But. I just can’t do it. A couple of years ago, I posted my dilemma to a Facebook group. Most people said, “Digitize then toss.” So, I digitized the reports. 

Then, I did not toss them.

I attended a talk given by Devon Noel Lee of Family History Fanatics at RootsTech 2018.[2] There, I learned about a helpful “test” to help determine whether an item is worth keeping.





Keep- It’s “Genealogical Gold”, if:
  •     It’s original
  •        It’s unique
  •        It’s highly sentimental






Don’t Keep- It’s “Chrome Plastic*”, if:
  •       Copies are available
  •        It’s available online
  •        It’s of limited sentimental value

*chrome plastic: looks valuable, but it's not



Made a lot of sense, so I “ran” the “test” on the items featured in this post.
  • It’s original. CHECK.
  • It’s unique. CHECK. (Pretty sure no one else has one!!)
  • It’s highly sentimental. UM. HMMM. WELL. I know it shouldn’t be sentimental. But… it is to me!!

Not surprisingly, I kept the original reports. 

I’d like to suggest a couple more items for the “Genealogical Gold” category:

  •        It’s part of a collection
    • Not only do I have the two reports, I also have a prescription from the same lab. (Did my grandfather not get it filled?) I also have some sort of document from a “sanitorium” dated 1935. Perhaps he was admitted there for treatment? So – a collection, right?
  •        It might be a clue to a story.
    •  My grandparents got married in 1930. Was this test part of a health exam in preparation for marriage? My grandfather died at work of a heart attack in 1959. He was only 58 years old. Did this “illness” (whatever it was) contribute to his weak heart? I haven’t done a lot of work on that branch, yet. What if these reports are part of a larger story?

There. I feel better. I think my two additions are quite plausible. And they certainly justify my decision to keep those urology reports!



[1] Read my review of “Planning a Future for Your Family’s Past” here: https://whoweareandhowwegotthisway.blogspot.com/2018/02/52-ancestors-week-nine-where-theres-will.html

[2] https://whoweareandhowwegotthisway.blogspot.com/2018/03/rootstech-2018-day-one-is-done.html

Thursday, October 11, 2018

52 Ancestors - #37 - What??? My Zodiac Sign Has Changed???

Week #37 of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks blog challenge was “Closest to Your Birthday.” I was planning on writing about some of my favorite birthday memories but I recently was made aware of some disturbing news. I AM NO LONGER AN AQUARIUS!

The other night one of my students asked me how to pronounce “Ophiuchus.” I’m generally pretty good at figuring out tough words, but that one had me stumped. “O-fi-u-kus?” “Af-i-u-kus?” So, I suggested we google it. I also asked her what it meant. (Yes- she was supposed to be doing her online work… but learning is learning, right?) Turns out, the word is pronounced “ah-fee-yuh-cuss” and is the world’s new horoscope sign.

Since “they” shoved this sign right into existing 12 signs (Ophiuchus: Nov 29 – Dec 17), all the zodiac signs have now shifted. Instead of identifying as Aquarius as I have my entire life, I now find myself being declared a Capricorn! Oh no, you don’t!  As my student and I were discussing this, another student became so anxious about losing her “identity,” she couldn’t even focus on her lesson. I decided to research this shocking news.

Apparently, we were a few years late learning the news! The original announcement was made in September 2016 when NASA explained that when the Babylonians created the zodiac, they wanted the dates on the calendar to correspond with the star constellations. [1]  But, there were 13 constellations and only 12 months on the calendar. So, they just ignored Ophiuchus. [2]  (Probably because it was the hardest to pronounce!)

Whatever will I do? Nothing. My zodiac sign didn’t change –the constellations just shifted.[3] In fact, NASA acknowledges astronomy and astrology are not the same. While the actual constellations have shifted, Western astrology follows a different system, which uses “artificial” constellations.[4]

As quoted from an update to a post from Glamour magazine:
Settle down, everyone. It seems your zodiac signs are as they've always been. In a statement to Gizmodo, NASA clarified … “We didn’t change any Zodiac signs, we just did the math,” NASA spokesperson Dwayne Brown said. “The Space Place article was about how astrology is not astronomy, how it was a relic of ancient history, and pointed out the science and math that did come from observations of the night sky.” Basically, NASA was merely pointing out why the astrological signs would likely be different if they were created today—because of a wobble in the Earth's axis, the constellations our signs were based on are no longer in the same spots—and what the heck those Babylonians were thinking when they assigned us all stars signs thousands of years ago. Everything is right with the world. Carry on.[5]
Whew! Thank goodness I don’t have to learn to accept a new identity! Because I surely don’t possess the traits of a Capricorn!!

Just out of curiosity, I put up a poll on my Facebook page with two descriptions labeled simply #1 (which was Capricorn) and #2 (which was Aquarius.) I asked people to determine which of the two best describes me. The results of this completely unscientific poll confirmed my suspicions:  89% of respondents chose Aquarius. 

Whew! After a brief scare, I can now rest easy. I am IN FACT an Aquarius!!



[1] https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/starfinder2/en/Here’s one source for the announcement:
[2] https://www.today.com/popculture/your-life-lie-zodiac-has-changed-here-s-your-new-t103295
[3] http://astrostyle.com/ophiuchus-nasa-new-star-signs/
[4] http://astrostyle.com/zodiac-sign-change-nasa-wrong/
[5] https://www.glamour.com/story/the-zodiac-signs-are-all-changing-according-to-nasa

Saturday, October 6, 2018

52 Ancestors -Weeks 35 and 36 - Finding Job Patterns In My Family

Continuing with this year’s theme of chronicling my generation, I am combining two weeks of Amy Johnson Crow’s blog challenge 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks. Week #35 was "Back to School" and Week #36 was "Work."

The combination is obvious, considering my work IS school (teaching school, that is!) Recently, in my Careers class, I was discussing Family Job Trees. The purpose of the activity is to identify job patterns in one’s family. This can be helpful when trying to determine a possible career path as we are often influenced by family.

Here is my family job tree:


As you can see, there were several educators in my family tree. I decided to explore my siblings and their career paths to see if the pattern extended further into my generation. I was not surprised to find that it did.


All FIVE of my biological siblings are teachers (One used to teach guitar so I’m counting that!) or trainers!!  So – 100% of my bio-sibs are educators! If you include the children of my father that adds one voice teacher and one expert in social media who educates others through her journalism. So that makes 7 out 9 or 78%.  


Here’s a genogram of my immediate family. (A genogram is a pictorial display of a person's family relationships.) The RED indicates a teacher/trainer. The BLUE indicates someone who is not.

*Technically, this sibling is NOT teacher at the moment, but since he taught guitar in the past, I'm counting him!! 

None of my stepdad’s kids are educators but one of their children is a Kindergarten teacher.  What does the job pattern look like for my children and the children of my siblings? Out of the nine old enough to be employed, four are teachers of some type. (I’m including the one currently taking a break from early childhood education!) I’d say there is most definitely a pattern in this family. There are seven children who have yet to choose their career path. I wonder if they will choose the same path as many other family members?


I could have made a genogram for that generation as well but it can be pretty time-consuming! I think the point is illustrated well enough to demonstrate there is a pattern in our family. I plan to examine the career choices of my ancestors in the future to determine how far back this pattern may go.

What patterns exist in YOUR family? Take the time to go beyond the vital records. Learning about the choices made by your ancestors may give you some insight into the choices you make!



Sunday, September 30, 2018

52 Ancestors - #34 - What Will My Descendants Find About Me?

The topic for Week 34 of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks was “Non-Population Schedules.”

 “The counting of people in the census which we use to locate families is called the Population Schedule. Additional schedules were used to identify and quantify resources and needs. These schedules are called Non-Population schedules.”[1]

If I was blogging about my ancestors I would have written about some of the sources I’ve used to help me put flesh on the bones of their stories. But – this year – I’m focusing on my generation. So, I found it tough to relate to this prompt. (Hence the procrastination. Truthfully, I’ve been SUPER busy!)

The next US Census will be released in 2022. That will be the 1950 Census. For privacy reasons, there is a 72 year wait before the information is released to the public. Which means the first federal census in which I will appear will be released in 2032. I will be listed as being 5 years old on the 1960 census. Hopefully, I will still be here to view my listing. I’ll only be 77 – so fingers crossed!

Still struggling to relate to the Week 34 topic, it occurred to me that Non-population schedules provide the genealogist with information not found on the census such as agricultural, business, social and manufacturing statistics. Information that may help the genealogist go beyond the BMD (birth, marriage, death) vital records. That made me wonder – where might my descendants locate information about me, besides the census and vital records?

Some sources are obvious – public information listings such as phone books and city directories. Newspaper databases (especially 1997 – remember the hamster that saved us from a fire?) will be a great place to learn about me and my family. Those lovely (now musty smelling) high school yearbooks might be useful (and will provide a good dose of laughter- some of those pictures!!) 



1971 Hamden High Student Council
1972 Senior picture
Full disclosure:
I really thought I WAS 4'10" at the time
























Of course, Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram posts will assist my descendants in recreating the minutia of my life. (Just tonight I posted a picture of our dinner – FASCINATING stuff!) Maybe they will find this family history blog and my blog dedicated to the dollhouse miniatures hobby I happily shared with my mom for so many years. 

http://dorettecreations.blogspot.com/


The Hamden town offices might provide a glimpse into my financial status, my cars and my residence. (Really gotta pay those car taxes…) My descendants might wonder why I registered as an Independent rather than affiliate with a political party. Maybe I’ll divulge that in a future post. It’s possible there will be records related to my 35+ years in education. I “think” I have a LinkedIn account too. 
This book will SOON
be ready to publish!


I worked with my sister-in-law
to create this updated edition of the
family history book originally written
by my father-in-law.





Perhaps my descendants will come across my Lulu.com account and be impressed with some of the family stories I’ve published. They may even discover I co-authored a book on a specific line of dollhouse furniture!




We are currently working on a 2nd Edition!!

Super proud of this book!
Created using two years of letters
written home by my mom during her stay
in Japan.





If I keep thinking about it, I’m sure I could come up with many more sources of information about my life.

How can this help you? If you are a family historian struggling to locate information about your ancestors, think BEYOND the census. (Exactly Amy’s point in suggesting the Non-population schedules!) Thomas MacEntee of Abundant Genealogy created a thorough checklist of possible sources which may be helpful.

If you’re not into family history – keep this in mind: It’s 2018!!! Unless you have been living under a rock (or extremely diligent in staying off the grid) your life is more than likely out there in cyberspace for all to see. Be smart about what you post. Like speaking – once you say it (post it) you can’t take it back. Unlike speaking – it’s out in cyberspace FOREVER!




[1] https://www.familysearch.org/wiki/en/Non-Population_Schedules

Sunday, September 16, 2018

52 Ancestors #33 - Family Legends

One of the reasons people delve into their family history is to prove and/or disprove family legends. Almost everyone has a story or two that just don’t add up. In fact, that is why I got into genealogy in the first place – to prove we were Irish. More on that later!

This week I have declared myself the Snopes.com of our family history. Rather than going into each “legend” in detail, I’m simply going to classify them. Some of these “legends” have been discussed on my blog before. If so, you will see the item as a hyperlink to the original article. Others will be examined in the future.

So – prompted by Week 33 of the 52 Ancestors blog challenge “Family Legends”, let’s get started!

“We are Irish.” FALSE    


 “We are related to Sir Samuel Montagu, a prominent English baronet in the 19th century.” UNPROVEN

I haven’t done much work on that one, but it’s pretty doubtful.

“We are related to Sheldon Leonard, the famous TV producer.” TECHNICALLY TRUE

We are related on my paternal side by marriage only.


“All the Holmans were given the middle name Winchester in honor of a beloved stepmother.” TRUE


“I could have been a princess.” WISHFUL THINKING

My mother never quite got over losing her upper-class status after fleeing Vienna in 1938. But, it’s pretty safe to say she would not have achieved “royal” status based on our pedigree.

“The Holmans have roots all the back to the Revolutionary War.” TRUE-maybe…

This claim is based on the application to the Sons of the American Revolution made by John W. Holman in 1951. I’m not 100% certain his application was ever approved, however, as he claimed our Revolutionary War patriot was Richard Winchester.** Everything I have researched indicates the Winchester connection is a step-mother and I’m not so sure that relationship qualifies!
**UPDATE: Scott just asked me whether I could tell if John's application was ever approved. Apparently, on September 9, 2013, I wondered the same thing. In my folder for John, I found I had downloaded the ENTIRE booklet titled: The History of the New Mexico Society of the Sons of the American Revolution 1908-1978. Right there...on page 16, it states that John W. Holman was one of 44 charter members of the New Mexico SAR. So - yup! It's TRUE!

“Our family was saved by a hamster.” 110% TRUE!!


So, there you have it. Seven family legends. I’m sure there’s more but if I keep thinking about it this blog will never get posted!!

Family – Please add to this list if there are legends you’d like me to research in the future!!

Readers- Think about the legends passed around in your families. Don’t stress about trying to prove/disprove them all but at the very least write them down!

Sunday, August 19, 2018

52 Ancestors #31 and 32 - "Youngest to Oldest" - My Car History!

The prompts for Weeks 31 and 32 of Amy Johnson Crow’s 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks blog challenge were “Youngest” and “Oldest.” I’ve been wanting to write about the cars I’ve owned for some time now and think this may be the time. I’ve searched my various albums – digital and print – for the past couple of weeks and found a few good photos. If I keep looking, I’ll never get this post written. I’ll just update the post if I find more!

My "youngest" car - 2014 Toyota Corolla
February 24, 2017
Saying goodbye to Mom's car - 2004 Nissan Sentra
February 24, 2017






















My current aka “youngest” vehicle is a 2014 Toyota Corolla. We purchased it in 2017 to replace the 2004 Nissan Sentra we bought from my mom. The Nissan truly fit the used-car salesman description of a car that was “owned by a little old lady who only drove it on Sunday.” My mom stopped driving early in 2011. When I bought the car from her, the 7-year-old car had only about 20,000 miles on it!

The Nissan purchase was a win-win for both me and my mom. I had tried to convince her to sell it for a couple of years. Mom was spending a lot of money on insurance for something she hardly used. She kept resisting, saying she felt better having a car in the driveway. What finally tipped the scale was that my 1997 Nissan Pathfinder got recalled. Apparently, it was “extremely unsafe” and unable to be repaired.


I really loved the Pathfinder! It was nice to be a little higher than other vehicles. Caitlin thought the Bose sound system was a good selling point. And it was “way cooler” than the 1993 Dodge Caravan that preceded it.


The 1993 Dodge Caravan

The Caravan. The symbol of suburban family life. The perfect vehicle for families with two kids. Each kid had her own row, cutting down on arguments. There were reports that the lift-gate might fly open unexpectedly. I wasn’t as concerned as my friend Stacy who wouldn’t let her kids sit in the back row. They were wearing seat belts, right? So, I figured they’d stay in their seats even if the back opened! The Caravan was pretty utilitarian without much character. Ours had a 6-disc CD changer so that was pretty cool. I only have two stories about the Caravan. One was the day Scott made the unfortunate choice to clean the inside of the van. Okay – there was a weird smell.  I probably should have investigated and cleaned it up before Scott discovered the cause. FYI – a cupholder full of week-old Coke-soaked French fries really stinks!! The other story might have been the impetus for trading in the van. While we never experienced the lift-gate issue, the sliding door suddenly decided to stop latching one day. Caitlin had to sit on the floor, holding the door shut the entire 6 ½ minute ride home from my mother’s house.


The 1988 Toyota Camry
Caitlin is showing off her backpack on the first day of school - 1994.

The Caravan replaced our first Camry.  I had been driving the 1988 Toyota Camry since surprising Scott with a blue 1989 Mitsubishi Max truck for Christmas in 1989. Scott had been driving the Camry which he bought in 1988. (That was the first of a line of Toyotas. He is now on his 5th Camry!) I was teaching at ACES in the “mods” (portable classroom) when Scott drove right up to my classroom door in a shiny white car.  There hadn't been any discussion about buying a new car – too expensive. We were sharing one car since Scott’s brown 1978 Datsun B210 -brown (given to him by his brother, Gerry) had been stolen from the New Haven train station. The universe had spoken – time for a new trustworthy vehicle!

Scott was driving the new Camry and I was still driving the only brand-new car I ever owned, a black 1982 Datsun 310. In 1982, Scott and I were “on a break” and he was living in Florida. As a young, single woman, I was so proud to have negotiated the purchase by myself. I don’t remember how much it cost but I do remember the loan came with 19% interest! Now I know to check my credit score before I make a big purchase! This car was the first of a line of non-descript, functional vehicles. Previous to the Datsun, all my cars had personality!!

Too bad this isn't in color. I looked "right in scale" driving
the yellow Honda Civic.

The Datsun replaced a teeny-tiny Honda Civic. I don’t even remember what model year it was. This was a car people would expect me to be driving – a teeny car for a teeny person! It looked like a bumblebee – bright yellow with a black stripe. The Hondamatic transmission had two speeds and you had to shift between them. No clutch though – that was the “…matic” part I guess. The only good story I have of the Honda is the day I was driving to work on Putnam Avenue and the car just stopped dead. Apparently, the “rubber band” (or whatever) that connected the gas pedal to the engine simply fell off in the middle of the road!

Proudly standing by my 1972 Plymouth Sport Satellite.
If you read my last post, you'll recognize that vest!
The Honda was the first of my “smallish” cars. Before that, I drove some massive vehicles. I must have looked ridiculous exiting my 1972 Plymouth Sport Satellite. The body was blue with a black vinyl roof. I do know it freaked people out when they were driving behind me. It looked like no one was driving! This car was HUGE! It had a pretty big engine too. It didn’t take much to get it up to 100 mph on the Merritt Parkway. (I may or may not have done that once – I don’t advise it!) The Plymouth had sweet 8-track. There was a bracket set-up which allowed you to take the 8-track out of the car and use it in your stereo system at home. One day, while my car was parked in the dirt lot behind Davis Hall at Southern Connecticut State College, some moron broke into the car and stole the 8-track. Jerk – you couldn’t even use it without the special bracket!! The other story about this car occurred during a trip with my sister, Kathy. We traveled from Connecticut to Vermont (3 miles from the Canadian border) for a job interview. (I didn’t get the job. My friend Susie did. Luckily we had decided to follow each other on the long trip.) On the way home, the weather took a nasty turn. At some point, the windshield wipers stopped working. No worries! I “Macgyvered” a solution. I tied our shoelaces together, ran them through the inside of the car and tied the ends to the wipers. Kathy did a great job of pulling the laces to make the wipers work until the blisters got too bad. We had to abandon the car in White River Junction, VT. Susie picked us up and we drove as far as we could in the increasingly bad weather. By the time we hit Meriden (just 20 minutes from home!) driving was just too treacherous so we checked into a Holiday Inn to wait out the storm. By then we were smart enough to listen to the radio and discovered we had been attempting to drive through what turned out to be Hurricane Belle, a Category 3 hurricane!

Wacky Pack stickers from 1973
Source:
https://www.ebay.com/i/202389205241?chn=ps


Sadly, I haven't found a picture of my 1965 Ford Galaxie 500.
Imagine this car with gold paint and tiger upholstery!
Source: http://www.mjcclassiccars.com/1965-ford-galaxie-500
The purchase of the Satellite was necessitated by the demise of my previous car, a 1965 Ford Galaxie 500. My stepdad, Alfie, crashed it into a pole in the Hamden Plaza during the Memorial Day parade (year unknown!) The Galaxie was the first car I bought with my own money. In 1972, I bought my very own car from the brother of a schoolmate. Oh, how I wish I had a picture of that car! Truly a classic! It was gold with a black vinyl roof. The upholstery was yellow and black tiger fur. And it had…. wait for it…. An 8-track!!! I have no recollection why, but I decided the dashboard needed a little sprucing up. So, I covered it with Wacky Pack stickers (courtesy of the drug store where I worked.) After some time, that seemed “immature” so I recovered the dashboard with black and yellow flowered contact paper. (Actually, I pretty much contact-papered everything I owned at that time!)

The car was full of “personality.” The driver’s seat was held up by a wood block. It was very important to keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times. If the block happened to slip out while you were driving, you’d find yourself totally reclined if you weren’t holding onto the wheel! Making a left turn could prove interesting at times. If you took the turn too quickly, the driver’s side vent window had a tendency to fall out. Oh, and there was no heat! That wasn’t an issue really. Unless you and your two best friends decided to visit your brother in Vermont in the late fall. Just so you know, you can stay pretty toasty warm sleeping in a car overnight if you had good sleeping bags! That was quite the trip. If I recall correctly, we started out by hitting a parked car in the Hamden Mart. I left a note but never heard from the owner. With no money for a hotel, we decided to sleep in the car.  Boy, were we surprised when we woke up in the morning and discovered we had parked in the middle of some guy's field. (Note: It was 1973! I don't suggest trying that in today's world!)

I became a pretty good “mechanic” during the years I owned the Galaxie. Back then you could actually repair your own car. I learned what cotter pins were (to hold things together) and how to adjust a throttle so the car would start. (You stick a flat-tip screwdriver in it then turn the ignition.) I also learned a lot about failing brake lines (Todd Street in Hamden is not the road on which you want to learn that lesson!) and “vapor lock” which was a constant source of the engine stalling.


My first car - a hand-me-down Plymouth station wagon.
That's my brother Dean in one of his many "costumes."

In retrospect, maybe the Galaxie wasn’t the best replacement for my first car. The very first car (the “oldest”) I ever owned was a Plymouth station wagon. I don’t know what model year it was – maybe 1963 or 1964? I was gifted the car (in 1971?) by my step-dad when he upgraded to a Ford Country Squire station wagon. (8 kids – no seat belts. Fun times!) When Alfie gave me the car, he said, “This car is named for you – it’s a PlyMOUTH!” Well – I did talk A LOT!!  The car was affectionately referred as the “Flintstone-mobile” because you could see the road through the rotted-out floorboards. At least until I had a cookie sheet welded to the frame! This was the car I first learned to drive and the one I drove when I went for my driving test. Like most vehicles back then, it was a good-sized car. I had to sit on a pillow, with the bench seat pulled as far forward as possible. Maybe that’s why my driving test consisted of only a trip around the block. The inspector probably couldn’t wait to get out of the car once he saw that pillow!

I got my license in 1971 as soon as I turned 16. I’m 63 now, so I’ve been driving for 47 years.  10 cars in 47 years. That’s an average of a new car every 4 ½ years. I’ve had the Corolla for a year and a half now. I wonder what I’ll own by 2021? Maybe I'll finally have that Jetson's flying car we've all been dreaming of since the 1960s!!

Monday, August 13, 2018

52 Ancestors - #30 - The "Mono" Skirt

The prompt for Week #30 of Amy Johnson Crow's 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks challenge is "Colorful." I'm still trying to catch up after returning from our trip so I'll make this short and sweet. (Like me!! Sorry, couldn't resist!)

During my teen years, I made pocket money babysitting for neighbors. BTW - does anyone do that anymore? I made a whopping 50¢ an hour. Of course, minimum wage at the time (late 1960s-early 1970s) was about $1.60!! I often sat for the Moskowitz family who lived four doors down. I liked sitting for them for two reasons:
1) They always had Mallomar cookies
2) Mr. Moskowitz worked as a fabric salesman. He would often give me his old sample books and sometimes even a half-yard or so of fabric. I was about 4' 4" at the time and didn't require much yardage so I could make clothes with little fabric. Hot pants and mini skirts were in fashion, so that helped too!

If you don't remember the fashion trends of the "Mod Mod World", let me refresh your memory: leisure suits, hot pants, mini/maxi skirts, bell-bottoms, platform shoes. The fabric of choice was polyester - preferably in shocking bright hues such as pink, yellow, blue, and green. Think Peter Max the artist. Oh, that polyester - you could throw it in the washing machine and dryer and nothing would happen. But get within 5 feet of it with an iron? MELT!!

So back to the topic. I had one particularly favorite outfit that I can envision perfectly. It's too bad I don't have a picture of it. Let me describe it to you: A yellow turtleneck shirt topped with a multicolor knit vest. A pair of hot pants (with cuffs!) fashioned from a half-yard of emerald green polyester. Knee-high socks with wide stripes of yellow, red, and green. And finally - red, yellow and green patent leather platform shoes! Yes, I wore that to work - gotta problem with that? I do have one picture to help you get some idea...

1973 - Southern Connecticut State College
The vest and shoes were my go-to accessories!
If that's not "colorful" enough for you, I saved the best for last. This item was a mainstay in my wardrobe - especially while I was recuperating from mononucleosis in March 1974. I created the patchwork skirt from dozens of psychedelic polyester fabric pieces torn from sample books given to me by Mr. Moskowitz. I still have the skirt, affectionately named by my sibling as "The Mono Skirt."

1973- Present from my Mom for my18th birthday -My first real 1" scale dollhouse
 OMG! Am I wearing the skirt AND the vest???

No longer in my wardrobe rotation (come on- give me some credit!), the skirt makes an occasional appearance at Halloween. I figure Paisley may enjoy it for dress-up a few years from now when she's older and taller.